by YKdvd on June 15th, 2005, 10:02 am
I'm not surprised they took the info down - I'm much more amazed it slipped out in the first place. We should also remember that it may be somewhat different from what might actually come along - those prices may have been anything from a rough draft to final gospel. And there are a number of possibilities for this outside of Rogers actually buying ZIP completely.
Personally, I can live with the cap idea, although these seem just a little low, but I can see where some current users will be very unhappy. It will also be interesting to see how they might go about advertising this. "Unlimited" is such an easy hook. In effect what a plan like this would do is replace the implicit cap caused by Canada Post speed and replace it with an explicit one. Existing high volume renters lose their subsidy, but it probably makes the system sustainable and thus benefits the majority.
But especially at these low cap levels, I'd hope they would consider some sort of credit that might build up in slow months that could apply to months that go over the cap. It shouldn't be a one-way ratchet where they get the extra revenue in high months and the benefit of lower shipping cost in the slow months.
It will be interesting to see what happens...
David Oberst
former Content Manager, ZIP.ca (Dec 2007-Feb 2009)